Archive for April, 2009

April
24

“The Marketing Ambush”

The Flash plugin is required to view this object.

When you hear the word “ambush” what comes to mind? Warfare? Exactly. You don’t think of business but that is exactly what can happen to you if you are lazy and you become predictable in the market.

Want Proof?

BMW "Checkmate" to Audi's "Your Move BMW"

This is a picture of a billboard in Southern California. You can tell it is California due to the sunny sky and one visible cloud. :-) To the left of the picture is a billboard which Audi posted, promoting their new car. Their tag line? A smug, “Your move BMW.”

How did BMW respond?

A full-on ambush.

They purchased the billboard space right next to the Audi ad and posted an ad for their new car with “Checkmate.” And this happened just DAYS following the Audi billboard. Audi cannot respond to “Checkmate” … that’s game over.

Stick a fork in Audi. They are done.

Taking on a competitor can seem like a good idea, but you must be prepared for the consequences. And being stung by a competitor can have severely damaging effects. Let me illustrate both topics and how you can both protect your business and aggressively go after your competitors.

Who is the enemy? Not your competitor, but predictability.

Let’s first discuss the issue Audi found themselves in. They went aggressively after a bigger, stronger competitor, who, rightfully so, came back and crushed them. Before going after a bigger competitor, make sure you have the ammo you need to defend yourself when they retaliate. Actually look for ways your competitor can come back at you. Write these down in your business journal and decide if your plan of attack is worth the return fire.

Now, let’s discuss how to protect yourself from getting attacked in the first place.

If you recall, during the Revolutionary War, both sides would just stand there and fire out in the open. “Taking cover” was looked at as “unmanly” and “poor sportsmanship.” Hey, I look at “lead poisoning” as unmanly too! Guerrilla fighting tactics are common place today. It is simple really. You ASSUME that when you are on patrol your enemy is watching your every move and you never go back to your base the same way twice.

The same is true with sports. John Madden, who recently retired from broadcasting, coached the Oakland Raiders for ten years. During his coaching days, the Raiders played Denver 18 times without suffering a loss. EIGHTEEN TIMES. What was the reason? “Simple really,” recalled Madden, “they would run the same three plays in certain key situations, so we practiced to exploit those plays. We kept thinking they would catch on and change things, but they didn’t.”

Are you as predictable?

This goes right in line with what I learned a decade ago from Mark Joyner. Predictability breeds death. Here is the summary of Joyner’s example:

Let’s say you sell furniture and you advertise in the Sunday newspaper without fail and you run the same ad, which is, if they come into your showroom on Monday with the ad, they get 10% off. It’s worked well and you’re just too lazy to test anything else out.

Your competitor takes advantage of your predictability and Sunday morning comes. You have the same routine, of course, and you read the paper with your morning coffee. The first thing you look at is your ad, but this time, your heart sinks. Directly across from your ad is a huge ad from your main competitor, “All Furniture 20% off. Sunday and Monday only.”

You brush it off, after all, you are closed on Sunday, it won’t be bad as you have plenty of loyal customers. But then Monday comes and your showroom is a Ghost Town. You begin to panic, so you have a new ad created. You decide that even though it will kill your margins, you need to move some furniture for cash flow, so you offer a 25% savings, beating your competitor’s 20% offer.

Not so fast.

Your competitor has your number. He knows you are lazy due to how you have been running your campaign. He also knows you don’t have much creativity and he correctly predicts your next move, which was to reduce your prices even further. Sunday comes. As you sit down with your morning coffee, you open the paper to see your ad of 25% off next to your competitor’s ad of only 20%, but instead, your heart sinks further than before.

“You Can Pay Lower Prices for LOWER QUALITY furniture, or for Just a Few Dollars More, You Can Invest in Furniture That Will Last You a Lifetime – Guaranteed.”

Monday morning when your store opens, the only foot traffic you get is from your employees. Not one customer. Game over.

Customers aren’t stupid. When they see the same message over and over, they will eventually tune it out. But more importantly, the same message can be easily exploited by a competitor.

I can hear you now … “But what about your “Lather, Rinse, Repeat” method Jerry? Where you find what works and do it over and over and over again?” Sorry if you misunderstood. That concept does NOT include a marketing message, headline, or ad. Those must always change as buying habits change, prospects change and demand changes. For example, if I find that advertising in Google AdWords is effective, I will continue to use Google AdWords until it stops working, but that doesn’t mean I just stick with the same ads and never change them. That would be stupid.

Remember: “Whatever can be tested, can be improved.”

If you are predictable, your competitor has a better opportunity to not just ambush you, but kill you. Look around, it is happening all around you. Rainmakers are those who avoid being ambushed and look for ways to properly attack their competitors in order to gain market share ethically. Want to learn more? Attend the SEO Rainmaker workshop in Nashville, TN June 25-26.

April
22

Expired / Typo Domains Part of Your Domain Portfolio?

For years webmasters have been purchasing expired domains with average to good PageRank in hopes of using them to boost their network of sites. It just makes sense, buy the domain, and either 301 the expired domain to your main site or build a new site and capture all the links the previous owner had. You think “Cool, instant links for me.” The problem is, it doesn’t always work out that way.

Most webmasters who register expired domains report an initial “push” of their rankings, but then suffer a “let down” days or weeks later as their rankings fall back around their original positions. What causes this? There has been a rumor going around the SEO space for a few years now that Google resets the link counts when domain ownership changes. That’s just not true. From my test results, it isn’t the “expired” domain that is the problem, it is the time “out of Google’s index” that seems to be the issue.

This is why it is vital for your sites to remain in Google’s index, or you risk having them be “reset” as a brand new domain. According to my testing, domains which are out of Google’s index for more than five weeks run a great risk of being “reset.”

Let’s summarize suggestions make by Matt Cutts on the topic of expired / typo domains:

- expired domains are best 301′d to your main domain
- “typo” domains should be 301′d to your main domain
- buying expired domains for link juice rarely are effective, as their link profile is reset
- don’t purchase or register typo domains of competitors

The rumors that Google has a system in place to detect real expired domains (a company forgetting to renew a domain) vs. expired domains purchased for the link value is a little over the top for me. I don’t believe they have such a system in place as knowing the “intent” is more human ability than machine ability.

April
15

Google Releases Local Guide

Google has released a Local Business Center User Guide to help business owners have more control how their businesses are listed in Google Maps. Included is a video on the process. This is HIGHLY recommended since the latest algorithm change that is including more local search results in the main Google SERPs.

April
15

Google Changes Referral Strings

Yesterday, Google announced that they are changing the referral strings in the SERPs.

Direct from Google:

Starting this week, you may start seeing a new referring URL format for visitors coming from Google search result pages. Up to now, the usual referrer for clicks on search results for the term “flowers”, for example, would be something like this:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=flowers&btnG=Google+Search

Now you will start seeing some referrer strings that look like this:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=7&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.example.com%2Fmypage.htm&ei=0SjdSa-1N5O8M_qW8dQN&rct=j&q=flowers&usg=AFQjCNHJXSUh7Vw7oubPaO3tZOzz-F-u_w&sig2=X8uCFh6IoPtnwmvGMULQfw

The key difference between these two urls is that instead of “/search?” the URL contains a “/url?”. If you run your own analyses, be sure that you do not depend on the “/search?” portion of the URL to determine if a visit started with an organic search click. Google Analytics does not depend on the “/search?” string in the referrer, so users of Google Analytics will not notice a difference in their reports, but other analytics packages may need to adapt to this change in our referrer string to maintain accurate reports.

This shouldn’t cause issues for the average webmaster. This is just another change Google is making as they move more of their technology to AJAX.

April
11

Leslie Rohde Slams the LSI Model

The Flash plugin is required to view this object.

By now you have probably heard and seen Leslie Rohde’s two videos from StomperNet’s Going Natural series: Advanced SEO: LSI is Lame and A Top Ranking Hiding in Your Site?

The first video bothered me because Leslie didn’t use the suggested title of: “You can’t spell Bull S**t Without LSI.” Humorous and true.

Now before you think this is a direct slam on Russell Wright of Theme Zoom and Bruce Clay, both of whom I consider personal friends, you are obviously looking for something that isn’t there. The only person Leslie seeks out to personally slam and humiliate is me, and I have the pictures to prove it.

Let’s face it, just the thought of LSI has always been sexy. And then the talk of the Google patents and things just sort of snow ball and we often lose sight of what really matters when it comes to ranking criteria. I remember from ’04-’06 I was a big supporter of LSI and Michael Marshall’s tool, Theme Master. The tool would later be sold to a company and it was renamed OptiRanker, very close to Leslie Rohde’s OptiLink and OptiSpider.

Which was quite interesting.

So, why did I support something that really didn’t work? Because I was an idiot. Yes, an idiot. It happens. Let me explain.

When you test, it is vital that you have a control page and a test page … and after you are done testing, you remove what you did and it should return back as it was before. I was just blinded by “LSI” in that it worked so well that I never reverted back – I just kept moving forward. And then a new staff member suggested removing the LSI components to see exactly how much of effect it had on the rankings in Google. So we did and guess what?

The rankings didn’t move.

We then tore out LSI components from all the pages we could find that we used Marshall’s tool on and the same thing …. rankings didn’t move.

It was then when I realized that LSI was just a sexy subject but not part of the algorithm as we had thought.

So watch Leslie’s videos and StomperNet is reopening Stomping the Search Engines 2.0, which I was a part of for just a dollar. The one part which Leslie didn’t mention that I feel is vital is that you must check the cache date where you get your links. If you acquire a link and the page isn’t indexed by Google and NEVER gets indexed by Google, how much impact do you think it will have on your site? Right. None!

Back to Russell Wright and Bruce Clay. Both of their models are solid and I am still a member and an active user of ThemeZoom. It is a great research tool. I’ve talked with Bruce at length about his methodologies and what Leslie debunks in this video is NOT part of Bruce’s methods – at least from my perspective. Watch the videos, and you will gain great insight how you can improve your rankings in about three days. Seriously.

April
9

Google Integrates Local Search in Mainstream Results

The Flash plugin is required to view this object.

On April 6th, Google announced they were going to integrate Local Search Results into the regular SERPs more frequently. And they weren’t kidding.

While it is far from perfect in serving true “local results” it is headed in the right direction. Here are some examples:

You can see the ZIP Code entry, however, if you input your ZIP code, the results will NOT all be local. This is something that they are still working on and clearing out the bugs in the system, however, it goes beyond because most of the AdWords ads displaying are from areas 200 miles away.

That’s hardly local.

Sure Google states that they will give you a “broad” geographical location based on your IP address and you can change your location by clicking on the “Change Location” link, but a 200 mile radius for local search is ridiculous.

Let’s get more specific and search for just “flowers” and look at your results. They should all be local to your area. In my area, even though she only does wedding flowers, my wife’s site is appearing #5 for the generic term “flowers” but more importantly, above her main competitor – which is always good. ;-)

If I search for “shoes” I don’t get any local results, but I do for pizza, dentist, doctor, and even if I type in “indian food.”

What does this mean?

Well, if you are selling ANYTHING you can now get in the main search results with your local listing. In my view, this is going to be huge and makes my Local Blueprint even more valuable. I’ll be finishing a complete analysis of this new change in Google and I’ll be posting the results for the members of the SEO Revolution (shameful paid membership plug). :-)