Archive for November, 2008

November
29

Microsoft Live November Updates

A summary of the recent updates at Microsoft Live for this month:

• Updated Compression – Takes the load off of your server which is a good thing. They were beginning to fall into the category of “Ask Jeeves” where they kill your server with spidering, but give little traffic.
• If-Modified-Since Feature
• Standardization of REP rules (Robots Exclusion Protocol) – time will tell if Live always obeys robots.txt.
• Sitemaps can be placed anywhere, not just in the root folder – this will be a great benefit to webmasters of large sites
• “Significant” increase in crawling capabilities – this will be a “wait and see approach”
• Webmaster Tools – They are starting to look as good as Google in this area.
• Filtering of webmaster reports – Exactly what are they filtering for? No specifics given.
• Malware tool – Finally.
• Request of a recrawl – If this works, it would be very cool.
• Excel keyword research for adCenter – This tool is already great, but because Google upgraded their free keyword research tool, it makes using this not so sexy.
• Web error toolkit to fix 404 pages – this has been asked to be included for awhile.
• New launch with Live Search API – will backlinks be allowed to be searched again?

In all, we’re VERY happy to see the changes that Microsoft is making with their search portal. I can finally say with confidence, Microsoft is serious about search.

November
28

Alexa Web Search Services To Shut Down

Yesterday it was announced that Amazon (owners of Alexa) was pulling the plug on the Web Search Service of Alexa.

Now before you start jumping the gun that Alexa is shutting down, they aren’t. This is just for the Web Search portion, which very few, if anyone, knew about. :-) And what is slightly comical is the press release states the service has been “depreciated” instead of just being honest and saying “shut down.”

November
24

Yahoo! Update Rolls Out

Yahoo! announced today that they have an update rolling out. According to the posting, they will be making changes to “crawling, indexing and ranking algorithms over the next few days and expect the update will be completed soon.”

Yahoo! has a history of completing the updates BEFORE they announce them, therefore, you can probably ignore the “next few days” comment. One change that I noticed is I dropped from #3 to #7 for the term “web marketing.”

The bottom line is, until Yahoo! can get more organic market share, changes they make to their algorithm will matter little.

November
20

Yahoo!’s Yang Quits – Stock Soars

Earlier this week Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang called it quits. The results? Their stock soared. It is bad enough thinking the company would be better off without you, it is another to have that reality confirmed by Wall Street the next day.

Yang’s “downfall” was pinned on his inability to close the deal with Microsoft. I disagree. There have been waves of bad decisions, including indecision on Yang’s part over the years. I cover these issues in my “How Yahoo Screwed Itself” blog post from last year.

November
13

Google’s SEO Guide

Sometimes when you ask for something and you get it, sometimes you regret asking so hard. And right now, many SEOs are doing just that with Google’s release of their Search Engine Optimization Starter Guide.

The guide is 22 pages and here is my take on the guide:

Notable Quotes:

“Search Engine Optimization is about putting your site’s best foot forward when it comes to visibility in search engines.” – Page 2

Title Tag

Home Page Title Tag: Brandon’s Baseball Cards – Buy Cards, Baseball News, Card Prices which lists the business name and three main focus areas.

Sub Page Title Tag: Top Ten Rarest Baseball Cards – Brandon’s Baseball Cards

Good: Accurately describe the page’s content
Create Unique Titles for Each Page
Brief and Descriptive Titles

Bad: Using non-related text or “Untitled” or “New Page 1″
Duplicate Titles
Unhelpful Titles
Keyword Stuffing

Description Tag

Meta Description is important because Google might use them as snippets for your pages.

Good: Accurately describe the page’s content
Use unique descriptions for each page

Bad: Information with no relation to the page’s content
“This web page” or “Page is about baseball cards”
Only filling in keywords
Copying and Pasting the entire content into the tag

Best Practices for URL Structure

Good: Use words in URLs

Bad: Lengthy URLs with Session IDs
Using Generic Page Names like page1.html
Using Excessive Keywords like baseball-cards-baseball-cards-baseball-cards.html

Create a Simple Directory Structure

Avoid: Nesting subdirectories: “../dir1/dir2/dir2/dir4/dir5/dir6/page.html”
Using directory names that have no relation to the content

Provide one version of a URL to reach a document

Avoid: mixing non-www and www versions in your internal linking structure
Using odd capitalization in your URLs

Site Navigation

Create a naturally flowing hierachy

Don’t link every page of your site to every other page
Don’t make your users click 20 times to get to deep content

Use mostly text for navigation

Avoid: Navigation dependent solely on drop down menus, images or animations.

Use Bread-Crumb Navigation

404-Error Pages
- make sure you have them set up on your server
- don’t let search engines index them
- don’t provide a vague message like “Not Found” – use a custom 404 page
- don’t use a design that is not consistent with the rest of your site

November
13

Google Voice & Video Chat in Gmail

If you haven’t seen it yet, check out this service from Google which allows you to have both video and voice chat through Gmail.

November
12

“Will It Blend?” Keynote – Viral Marketing

At Webmaster World in Las Vegas, the keynote from this morning was the founder of “Will It Blend” from Blendtec blenders, a small company based out of Provo, Utah of all places. They Manufacturer both Commercial and Consumer equipment. They didn’t have any presence in the marketplace. They decided to bring on an web marketing expert and they wanted to get brand awareness through viral marketing. They started doing research and brainstorming to find a campaign they could make Viral. They found an idea through their common practices, seeing it things would “blend” in their blenders.

They found this intriguing and deciding to test run this concept on the web via YouTube. Their first test was taking a board and letting the blender grind it up. It was an instant success.

Keys to Viral Marketing:
• It needs to be entertaining but not necessarily funny
• Make it something people will want to see and good enough to pass onto others
• Include the corporate objective
• Sponsored by the manufacturer
• Base it on real people as it is easy to replicate
• Interact and comment with your viewers
• Make a suggestion to your viewers of what to expect next time
• Experiment with “Try This!” and “Don’t Try This at Home.”
• Market yourself on YouTube, Digg, Facebook, etc.
• Ask for the viewers input
• Make it simple for the viewers to subscribe
• Be Honest and Accurate with your content

Note: Understand that if you post your ENTIRE video on YouTube or another similar service, you may be transferring the rights to them. It may be wise to instead, post “teasers” on YouTube to get them to your site so you keep all the rights to yourself.

The Public will scrutinize your content. It will create brand awareness and allow you to interact. What about the risk? The only risk is not trying. We are the only people who hold ourselves back. If we overcome the fear the possibilities can be endless.

On your launch ask your current customers, friends, relatives to write reviews and pass the content on throughout their contacts. Use them as leverage into the market. They can help start the viral effect very quickly. You may also consider posting the content at Break.com, which can be extremely viral with the right video.

Your Results:
• Brand Awareness in the market
• Subscribers
• Sales/Conversion
• Traffic
• Pull through Impact in Commercial/Consumer Products
• Possible Links/ Relationships
• Expansion within your company

November
10

Google Webmaster Chat Wrapup Pt. 7

… it finally comes to an end …

Question: How does Google view content that is placed in divs that are hidden/display none until a user does something? These are also good places to stuff SEO content that a user may never see. What is best practise from Google’s point of view?

Wysz: I’ve addressed this question in the Google Webmaster Help Group here:

http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help-Indexing/browse_thread/thread/b2d09046ab4d5ed/

And here:

http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help-Indexing/browse_thread/thread/5d31cc395fe20b64/

What is boils down to is intent:
If it’s there for the user, you’re probably safe. If you’re trying to deceive search engines… that’s risky. :)

Question: Duplicate content is always penalized by search engines.
Then what is the reason that duplicate news content spread across many sub-domains from yahoo.com and many other popular sites does not gets penalized?

JohnMu: As far as I know, none of the search engines penalize duplicate content — they just ignore the duplicates.

Question: I have reworked a site. I have deleted all of the pages with nasty code. Some of the pages still appear as “not found” by web crawler, even though no links point to the deleted pages. Are they held in a cache? How do I delete?

JohnMu: It generally just takes a while for things to clear out — so I wouldn’t worry about it or try to manually remove them.

Question: How many chained 301 redirects does Google not “like”?

Nathan J: It’s ok to chain a few together; I would avoid doing a whole bunch, like 20 or 30. :)

JohnMu: As far as I know, the HTTP 1.0 standard allows for a maximum of 5 redirects for a URL. That said, search engines might treat it in different ways, so I’d recommend reducing the redirects to a minimal number.

Question: I have a folder (used in URL path), it’s name includes a hyphen, which I read was not friendly for google.

JohnMu: Hyphens and underscores are fine :-) . If you do decide to rename something, I’d recommend making sure that you use 301 redirects appropriately.

Question: I have reported sites that clearly have paid links (e.g. the backlink page says “Advertising” above the link), but Google does not seem to take action. Why would that be the case?

Kaspar aka Guglarz: While paid links and spam reports are being taken very seriously by Google, the results may not be seen immediately for users or even not at all. This does not mean no action is being taken on the offending sites. Also, the TLD of the sites should not be a factor being taken into account. For this reason reporting both, web spam and PageRank passing link selling makes sense and contributes in an important way to the quality of Google’s index.

Question: How often does your search algorithm change?

JohnMu: We change the algorithms all the time – last year we had over 450 changes.

Question: Is it still worthwhile to buy links from good quality, niche directories?

Wysz: Buying links which pass PageRank is not something that we recommend.

Question: Does Googlebot follow the information given on the last modified headers? Does it look at E-tags?

JohnMu: Hi Fer, we do take a look at the lost modification headers. You can spot that in your server’s logs – it should show a 304 response code (“not modified”). That said, many sites are set up in a way that return 200 even for pages which haven’t changed.

Question: How many times a year do you update a site PageRanking?

Matt Cutts: PageRank is re-computed all the time (different PageRanks every day). But we update the toolbar PageRank 3-4 times/year.

Question: Does Google prejudice a link based on having a parameters after URI (e.g. a tracking code)?

Nathan J: Sometimes Googlebot has a hard time crawling pages with dynamic urls that have a ton of parameters. It’s a good idea to keep them to a minimum.

Question: Should I be using hyphens instead of underscores in my URLs to improve a page’s rank?

Matt Cutts: For the time being, I would recommend still using hyphens instead of underscores. If you’re already using underscores and that’s working fine for you and your rankings, it’s not worth switching. But if you’re doing a new site, then I would go with hyphens.

Question: Does link: gives exactly the number of back links to a site?

Wysz: The link: operator only shows a sampling of links to a site, so it may not show all of the links that Google knows about. To find more information about backlinks to your own site, we give verified site owners more information about backlinks in Webmaster Tools.

Question: Do the verification codes for Webmaster Tools have to remain intact after the first verification or can you just remove them once it’s done?

Wysz: We do recheck for those codes periodically to make sure you are still the site owner. So you’ll want to leave that code in place as long as you want to use Webmaster Tools.

Anonymous: Can my site be penalized if I use rel=”nofollow” too much?

Kaspar aka Guglarz: No, you run no risk of an impact on your site’s rankings if you use the attribute

Question: Thoughts on SE Rank Checking software? Are you against them? Would you purposely disable them?

JohnMu: I generally believe that rank checking software doesn’t make much sense anymore (not to mention that they’re against our Terms of Service and could result in us blocking your IP address). We use a lot of personalization and geotargeting in our search results – so what ranks high for one user might not rank high for others. It doesn’t really help you much to know a “ranking number” if you can’t tell how far this ranking is actually something that the majority of your users are likely to see.

November
10

Google Webmaster Chat Wrapup Pt. 6

still continuing …

Question: Are subdomains considered entirely separate entities if they have no links from the parent domain. e.g. if widget.example.com has no links from www.example.com, is it on its own in terms of reputation, or will it rank through association alone?

JohnMu: We treat each URL separately. That said, if you have www and non-www versions of your site, I’d recommend setting a preferred domain and setting up a 301 redirect. Also, sometimes it makes sense to add both your www and non-www versions in Webmaster Tools so that links for both versions are known (and shown). Susan recently covered that in a blog post.

Question: Can you tell me how Google decides whether to include video on the first page of the SERPS or not? Views? Links? Age? Relevance? What’s the most important?

Matt Cutts: I think relevance is always the top-level answer, because we want the best information (be it search results, videos, or even ads) to come up highly. And relevance for each property will vary–for ads it might be clickthrough, and for video it might be different signals.

Question: You claim that you can identify original content and RSS scrapers, but still why scrapers are ranking better for certain keywords?

Wysz: We do our best to identify duplicates and identify the best URL for a set of content. There are a couple of ways you can help us out with this. In your content, if you’re providing articles or other information that may be syndicated across other sites, include a full link (not just a relative link) back to your site so you can more easily be identified as the originator of the content. And if you find that a scraper site is spamming Google’s search results, please submit a spam report via Webmaster Tools.

Question: What is the minimum time a webmaster should wait before re-applying for a reconsideration & how does a webmaster know that his request has actually been seen by someone.
Kaspar aka Guglarz: The turnaround time for reviewing reconsideration requests is usually very fast, it actually can be as quick as 24 hours. However, the results of it can kick in after awhile. Please keep in mind that once a site has lost Google’s trust, rebuilding it can take some time. If you have applied for a consideration and received a confirmation via email, give it some time first. If your site is positively Google webmaster compliant, try again after a week or two, if there is no change in the SERP’s. However, please keep in mind that if your site has been hacked cleaning it up AND fixing the server/site can be time intense and needs to be done accurately, in order to prevent the problem from happening again.

Question: Will it make any difference between a shared IP and a dedicated IP on SEO or search results, as opinions are divided on this aspect?

JohnMu: Most of the web is on shared IP addresses, so it doesn’t make much sense for us to give those on dedicated IP addresses any advantages. That said, if your server is struggling with the load of your website, it might make sense to move to a dedicated server that helps to make sure that your users are happy when visiting your website.

Question: If I 301 redirect a well-ranked page to a new domain with the exact same content, will all of the rankings be replaced with the new domain once it has been indexed? How long after indexing can we expect the swap? And is the same thing true for 302s?

Wysz: If you’re moving from one URL to another (even if it’s on a different domain), ranking signals can be passed via a 301. A 302 is used for temporary redirects, so this is less likely to transfer ranking signals.

Question: I have 2 sites, one is domain.com and the other one is domain.au. They share a lot of their content, is there a way to keep the content on both sites without blocking it on either, while ensuring they only show on their respective geo locations?

Maile Ohye: It’s helpful that you have separate TLDs. While you can’t “ensure” that your content shows only to certain geolocation, you can use some of our features to help. Here are more resources in case you missed them:

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-to-start-multilingual-site.html

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/10/better-geographic-choices-for.html

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/04/where-in-world-is-your-site.html

So for Australia, domain.au will help with targeting and Webmaster Tools will not be needed.
For other areas — say Canada, you can use geolation in Webmaster Tools for canada.domain.com or www.domain.com/ca or www.domain.com/canada.

Question: Duplicate content – www. and non www. – I understand the best practice is to have a perm redirect for the non www to the www. some appear to get away with it and rank high, others dont –
Duplicate content agn – domainname.co.nz and domainname.com?

JohnMu: Doing a redirect or not doing one does not significantly impact your site’s crawling, indexing or ranking in Google. I’d still recommend doing that though – otherwise it can confuse users to see different domain names for the same content. If you have a local (.com.nz) and a global (.com) site, then I would recommend using separate content for them (since there are going to be different users) — but I wouldn’t worry too much about it if you have the same content at the moment.

Question: A site has lost sitelinks. No significant changes were made to site architecture, e.g. menu templates. Overall public PR has actually increased. Suggestions as to how to keep dynamically generated sitelinks? How often are they recalculated?

Nathan J: Sitelinks are dynamically generated – more info.

Question: 1000′s of junks sites are spamming Google index & Googlers still find time to penalize or ban more genuine sites. How do you plan to fight spam in longer term.

Answer: As far as how we fight spam, we can’t reveal too much. Spammers might be reading.

Question: I have been experiencing sudden drop in rankings for my sites. One day it would be on #3 and the other day it would go back to #19 or #26. Any specific reason behind this?

Kaspar aka Guglarz: Most likely, you have been accessing different Data Centers checking your rankings. As Google DC’s are being updated continuously but not all simultaneously, slight variations in the SERPs are possible.

November
9

Google Webmaster Chat Wrapup Pt. 5

continuing ….

Question: Does inconsistent capitalization of URLs cause duplicate content issues and dilution of page rank? For example www.site.com/abc vs www.site.com/Abc. On Windows hosts, these are the same page, but are different pages on Unix hosts.

JohnMu: Based on the existing standards, URLs are case-sensitive, so yes, these would be seen as separate URLs. Since the content on the URLs is the same, we’ll generally recognize that and only keep one of them. However, we’d recommend that you try to keep all links going to one version of the URL. Keep in mind that this also applies to robots.txt files.

Question: Does appearing high in image searches help improve the host sites PR and appearance on standard searches?

Answer: Well-optimized, relevant images could definitely help increase traffic to your site, especially with the introduction of Universal Search, where we mix images, videos, and more into the web search results.

JohnMu: Your site’s ranking in Image Search doesn’t impact your site’s PageRank. However, as we continue to include images and other types of content in the search results, we might start showing your images in normal web search results as well. So I’d definitely recommend making sure that your great images are available to search engine crawlers.

Question: Does Googlebot strip URL fragments? In other words, is a link to /path/#fragment the same as a link to /path/ ?

JohnMu: Yes, we remove URL fragments since they are processed on the client side and not relevant when fetching URLs from your server.

Question: Is there a META tag we can use to tell Google the geotarget (country) of a particular webpage?

Maile Ohye: We don’t have META geotargeting capability at this time. So the best ways to target a geographic region are talked about here:

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-to-start-multilingual-site.html

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/10/better-geographic-choices-for.html

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/04/where-in-world-is-your-site.html

Question: Until recently external links from article directories could improve page ranking. Is this still valid? Do links from article directories have a better weight than links from web sites or blogs?

Matt Cutts: Article directory links certainly aren’t inherently worth more and don’t get more weight than other web sites or blogs. I answered another question about article directories as well.

Question: Can my site be penalized if somebody else uses ranking check software on it?

Kaspar aka Guglarz: No! Don’t worry abut that.

Question: Does a page load time play a crucial role in Google Page Ranking? If yes how important is it?

Nathan J: I think the more important issue here is user experience. If your site loads fast, your users will be happy; if it loads slow, users will be less happy. Make your users happy, right?

Question: I have a website in 5 languages (and I cannot buy 5 different localized domains), which option is the best? To have different subdirectories (domain.com/en) or to have different subdomains? (en.domain.com)

JohnMu: Both versions are fine. I personally generally recommend using a subdomain when the sites are completely different and using subdirectories when it’s more or less a shared site, but it’s up to you.

Question: What is ok/not ok to sell links? We get requests on a daily base, we not offering to sell links, but sometimes we get a related request and wonder if we are “allowed” to sell one or two links without hurting our rankings?

Nathan J: Paid links that pass pagerank are not a good idea; more info here – http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66736

Question: Any chance of Google favoring sites with valid markup anytime soon? On the principle that if the webmaster has taken the trouble to write valid markup, it’s less likely to be a spammy site?

JohnMu: Since less than 5% of the pages out there actually validate according to study done by Opera, it wouldn’t make much sense for us to give the other 95% of the pages any trouble. You can find the study at http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama-markup-validation-report/

Question: If my sub domain got high Page Rank, how far it will contribute to the main domain?

JohnMu: PageRank is on a page-by-page basis. The PageRank of a page (on a subdomain or not) is based on the links to it.

Question: Given, the incoming links are intact and there is no link buying/selling. Can there be any other reason for a drop in Page Rank?

JohnMu: Assuming the number of links stays the same, it’s always possible that some links change with regards to the way they pass PageRank.

Question: How will i know that a website is banned by google in SERP (search engine result pages).

Wysz: To see if you’re indexed in Google, try a site: search on your site. For example, site:example.com. We may also drop a message in the Message Center of your Webmaster Tools account if we detect an issue with your site.

In general, it’s best to make sure you stay within the webmaster guidelines.

If you feel your site may have been penalized, go ahead and fix the problems, then file a reconsideration request.

Question: When we report a site for buying links, how long does it take for Google to act on it? If the violator is still listed ”and the bought links are still present”what other action can we take?

Nathan J: It’s tough to give a specific time frame, but rest assured that we do look at all requests.

Question: Is there a “glass ceiling” that either prevents sites from monopolizing the index or throttles traffic to specific sites?

Maile Ohye: Our index has lots of sites, it would be hard for one to monopolize it. There are certain things we do to prevent one site from monopolizing search results (for a given query) because users tend to prefer seeing multiple sites in their results when they enter a search term. Also, results are filtered when the title and snippets are identical (even if the domains are separate) because that users don’t like seeing the same title/snippets.
I’m not sure if I’m addressing your concern, but I wouldn’t worry about a “glass ceiling.” Every site has a chance of being returned in search results.

Question: Recently you posted on the webmaster central blog that you would suggest to not rewrite dynamic urls to static. Is there penalties for sites that rewrite? Would you suggest changing if a site has 5+ years history? Can you discuss further?

Maile Ohye: If your site is already doing well and you have rewrites, then you’re probably doing them properly so please don’t worry about it.

In our blog post, we wanted to discourage new sites, or less experienced webmasters, from feeling they HAD to use rewrites. We’ve improved our processing of dynamic URLS, so there’s no need for newer webmasters to be afraid of them any longer.

Question: Does 301 Redirect moves the Google Page Ranking to the new location? If so how long does it take for this to take effect?

Wysz: Where appropriate, ranking signals will be transferred across 301 redirects (if the same page has moved from one URL to another). This may take some time, so you should probably leave the redirect in place as long as you have control over the URL. That way any new links will make our crawler follow the 301.

November
8

Google Webmaster Chat Wrap Pt. 4

…continuing …

Question: Does the Geotargeting feature in Webmaster tools hold as much weight as having a country-specific TLD?

Kaspar aka Guglarz: Google uses a bunch of signals like location of the server or the TLD in order to determine which users might be interested in the sites content. Geotargeting is a way for Webmasters who use non country specific TLD’s like .net/ to tell Google which your target group was, if the site is specifically targeted to users from a particular area. Think of the site of a small, local hardware store or a vet for example. Potentially, their main target users would be people living in the nearby area. Geotargeting is not to be used for language targeting though.

Using the tool may have some effect on non-country-restricted searches, but it probably won’t be the same as having the country-specific TLD. Most sites will see results somewhere between the two extremes (no effect, and total equivalence with ccTLDs). Read More.

Question: Do you feel that the Webmaster should be informed in case of a manual penalty & the reconsideration requests should be looked into more seriously in case of a manual penalty.

Kaspar aka Guglarz: Imagine you have a site on which you add original content and/or tools on a regular basis. If it has been hacked and contains hidden content/links or you are a website owner and your webmaster did something he/she was not aware of being outside Google webmaster guidelines, like a 0 seconds redirection. In that case chances are high you would be informed about a temporary removal from Google results via Google Webmaster Tools. The message will surely contain hints regarding the problem on the site. Once you have fixed it, your reconsideration request will be reviewed very carefully.

On the other hand, if you have a couple of hundreds of identical sites with – for example – scraped content from other sites, these are not adding any value to the Internet and I would not expect any notifications from Google.

Question: Some Blackhat linked to my blog from 300+ adult splogs as revenge for calling him out. My blog had #1 ranking for it’s keywords, now it is on the second page at best. Can mass amounts of links from “bad neighborhoods” cause a drop in site ranking?

Nathan J: We work hard to make sure a site can’t have a negative effect on another site. Feel free to report spam if you think you find some.

Question: Will too much of “rel=nofollow” or totally “nofollow” to all outgoing links by the author of a blog be stamped as over optimization and penalized? Is there any penalty for over optimization sort of stuff?

JohnMu: I wouldn’t worry about this. I would try to work on making the site as natural as possible.

Question: Is abc.com/def better or def.abc.com better in terms of Search Engine Positioning.

Nathan J: From a search engine standpoint, both are good – it really is a matter of preference. Depending on what you’re trying to do, it may be easier to manage one over the other.

Question: Is the bounce rate and speed taken into account when ranking a page? i.e. if you see a searcher click on a result then return very quickly and choose another result, is the first page ranked lower?

JohnMu: Assuming that users will be jumping out of a site like that, there’s a high probability that they won’t be willing to recommend it to others (or come back themselves). So yes, indirectly at least, if a site is made in a way that users run away right away, then chances are that we might not be recommending it as much as other sites that users like (and recommend to others).

Question: Many believe that to rank well, you simply need “quality” backlinks. But how important is having your keywords in the , and throughout your site? Is keyword density of any importance to show what the page is about? What % is suggested?

Wysz: Links are just one factor involved in Google’s ranking of pages. We look at both on-page and off-page content, so what you have on your page can be an essential part of ranking. However, there is no recommended “keyword density.” Your content should be high quality and written for users. If you try writing for search engines, the language can become very unnatural, which may end up hurting you more than it helps.

Question: How will social media or more specifically share of comments (buzz about a brand) influence the SERPs?

Maile Ohye: Social media is great! But, there are a few things to say about this… Social media can add buzz to your site, finding new visitors, people linking to you, etc. That’s a bonus and the more users that enjoy your content, often the better your site will show in SERPs. We want results to reflect what users are searching for, so social buzz can certainly be helpful.

A few things to note:

1. If you allow user-generated content on your site, remember to monitor for spam.
2. Also, if you’re looking to get buzz to directly help your site in SERPs, know that we normally don’t crawl javascript, so if it’s hosted in javascript you’ll still get the user traffic from the buzz (which can eventualy lead better rankings), but the user comments themselves won’t be indexed.
3. If you want to get the user-generated content associated with your site (as part of your URLs), then make sure you host the user-generated content on your domain (so it’s not link to a separate site).

November
7

Google Chat Wrap Pt. 3

… continued from yesterday …

Question: Does the Geo-Targeting feature in Webmaster Tools hold as much weight as having a country-specific TLD?

Example: www.domain.net vs. www.domain.co.uk

Kaspar aka Guglarz: Google uses a bunch of signals like location of the server or the TLD in order to determine which users might be interested in the sites content. Geo-Targeting is a way for Webmasters who use non-country specific TLD’s like .net/ to tell Google which your target group was, if the site is specifically targeted to users from a particular area. Think of the site of a small, local hardware store or a vet for example. Potentially, their main target users would be people living in the nearby area. Geo-Targeting is not to be used for language targeting though.
Using the tool may have some effect on non-country-restricted searches, but it probably won’t be the same as having the country-specific TLD. Most sites will see results somewhere between the two extremes (no effect, and total equivalence with ccTLDs).

According to what I have witnessed, having the country specific TLD is always preferred.

Question: Do you feel that the Webmaster should be informed in case of a manual penalty & the reconsideration requests should be looked into more seriously in case of a manual penalty.

Kaspar aka Guglarz: Imagine you have a site on which you add original content and/or tools on a regular basis. If it has been hacked and contains hidden content/links or you are a website owner and your webmaster did something he/she was not aware of being outside Google webmaster guidelines, like a 0 seconds redirection. In that case chances are high you would be informed about a temporary removal from Google results via Google Webmaster Tools. The message will surely contain hints regarding the problem on the site. Once you have fixed it, your reconsideration request will be reviewed very carefully.

On the other hand, if you have a couple of hundreds of identical sites with – for example – scraped content from other sites, these are not adding any value to the Internet and I would not expect any notifications from Google.

While Google does the best job of the “Big Three” in terms of informing website owners of potential problems, many of the issues go unreported.

Question: Some Blackhat linked to my blog from 300+ adult splogs as revenge for calling him out. My blog had #1 ranking for it’s keywords, now it is on the second page at best. Can mass amounts of links from “bad neighborhoods” cause a drop in site ranking?

Nathan J: We work hard to make sure a site can’t have a negative effect on another site. Feel free to report spam if you think you find some.

While Google maintains that incoming links cannot have an adverse effect on a site, I disagree as I have tested this hard and incoming links can and do damage sites – with an exception. It seems clear that sites who do not have the proper link foundation when flooded with garbage links, their link profile tips severely and rankings begin to drop rapidly. Having a solid link profile creates a type of “bullet-proofing” of your site against attacks such as these.

Question: Will too much of “rel=nofollow” or totally “nofollow” to all outgoing links by the author of a blog be stamped as over optimization and penalized? Is there any penalty for over optimization sort of stuff?

JohnMu: I wouldn’t worry about this, Raj. I would try to work on making the site as natural as possible.

I asked Matt Cutts this at PubCon in ’07 and he said you can be as aggressive as you want with “nofollow” on your site and you won’t see any negatives. I’ve tested this since then and it is true. I have never seen a negative issue solely related to aggressive use on a site.

Question: Is the bounce rate and speed taken into account when ranking a page? i.e. if you see a searcher click on a result then return very quickly and choose another result, is the first page ranked lower?

JohnMu: Assuming that users will be jumping out of a site like that, there’s a high probability that they won’t be willing to recommend it to others (or come back themselves). So yes, indirectly at least, if a site is made in a way that users run away right away, then chances are that we might not be recommending it as much as other sites that users like (and recommend to others).

I have seen evidence that click-through and bounce rate is being measured in the SERPs.

Question: Many believe that to rank well, you simply need “quality” backlinks. But how important is having your keywords in the title, meta tags, and throughout your site? Is keyword density of any importance to show what the page is about? What % is suggested?

Wysz: Links are just one factor involved in Google’s ranking of pages. We look at both on-page and off-page content, so what you have on your page can be an essential part of ranking. However, there is no recommended “keyword density.” Your content should be high quality and written for users. If you try writing for search engines, the language can become very unnatural, which may end up hurting you more than it helps.

While this is an excellent question, it is similar to asking a politician, “Tell us all the lies that you have told.” Do you really think you’re going to get a straight answer? Here are my testing results:

Title Tag: If you have the keyword phrase in the Title Tag, it is possible to have the content of the page be blank and gain a Top Ten ranking from incoming links alone. I have done this personally as had SEO phenom Leslie Rohde. The Title Tag does have weight, but it must be used in conjunction with a solid link campaign.

Meta Tags: Google doesn’t read the Keyword Meta Tag, however, you can read more on Google Meta Tags.

Keyword Density: The On-Page factors with Google aren’t as vital as they are with Yahoo! or MSN. I recommend you stay 4% or below and I generally keep in the 1-2% range.