Archive for December, 2006

December
26

Leslie Rohde Hangs ‘em Up

Did anyone else see this? Leslie Rohde Quits. I was away for the holidays and return to find out one of the best has, in essence, “walked away” from his subscriber base – OptiSmarts. It was cool while it lasted, he did a weekly video that shed a lot of light on linking and SEO. I learned a ton from Leslie’s videos. I’ll miss them.

Leslie is basically saying that “You cannot live on SEO alone.” That, I think we have all known – that SEO is just a small piece of the overall puzzle. I have been teaching basically the same thing for years … as I learned the concept early in 2000 from Michael Campbell. It isn’t a new concept, but I think Leslie is hitting it hard because people just don’t get it … they think that SEO is the cure-all.

I speak to Leslie on a slightly regular basis regarding SEO, my testing results, and such. I am surprised by this announcement and he says he’ll have another announcement on the 1st. I guess we’ll have to wait …

December
26

I’ve Been Wrong Before … I Married My First Wife

Leading up to Webmaster World in Vegas, I geared up the members of SEO Revolution to prepare for the annual algorithm (or filter) update from Google. I was seeing the same type of movements in the datacenters that showed an update was coming … however, an update never came.

I have been wrong before …

Here is a summary of what Matt said:

Algorithm update: Typically yields changes in the search results on the larger end of the spectrum. Algorithms can change at any time, but noticeable changes tend to be less frequent.

Data refresh: When data is refreshed within an existing algorithm. Changes are typically toward the less-impactful end of the spectrum, and are often so small that people don’t even notice. One of the smallest types of data refreshes is an:

Index update: When new indexing data is pushed out to data centers. From the summer of 2000 to the summer of 2003, index updates tended to happen about once a month. The resulting changes were called the “Google Dance”. The Google Dance occurred over the course of 6-8 days because each data center in turn had to be taken out of rotation and loaded with an entirely new web index, and that took time. In the summer of 2003 (the Google Dance called “Update Fritz”), Google switched to an index that was incrementally updated every day (or faster). Instead of a monolithic monthly event, the Google would refresh some of its index pretty much every day, which generated much smaller day-to-day changes that some people called “everflux”.

Over the years, Google’s indexing has been streamlined, to the point where most regular people don’t even notice the index updating. As a result, the terms “everflux,” “Google Dance,” and “index update” are hardly ever used anymore (or they’re used incorrectly :) ). Instead, most SEOs talk about algorithm updates or data updates/refreshes. Most data refreshes are index updates, although occasionally a data refresh will happen outside of the day-to-day index updates. For example, updated backlinks and PageRanks are made visible every 3-4 months.

What you need to take away from this is that an index update is a type of data refresh. Don’t get hung up on “update” vs. “refresh” since they’re basically the same thing. There’s algorithms, and the data that the algorithms work on. A large part of changing data is the index being updated.

Read Matt Cutts’ statements on the “algorithm update that never happened.”

December
26

Happy Holidays

Wishing everyone the best during this holiday season from our staff. 2007 is just around the corner, and with 2006 being a record breaking year, we are expecting more of the same in 2007!

December
22

Duplicate Content Issues

Adam Lasnik discussed a few days ago to “not worry too much about duplicate content.” Essentially that Google has ways of identifying similar pages and will, in most cases, index only one of them.

I think this statement is exactly why webmasters worry “a lot” about duplicate content, because of all the scapers and content hijackers, they don’t want the thief’s version getting indexed and their version getting left out in the dark.

Some common issues are:

  • You can have two identical pages on your site, which is common in blogs where pages representing a particular date is more or less identical to a regular post page.
  • You can have content that is grabbed from another site (with our without the original author’s knowledge).
  • You can have “printer friendly” or “mobile friendly” pages with the same content as your web based content.
  • Different URLs may point to the same page (www.seorevolution.com, www.seorevolution.com/index.html, seorevolution.com, etc.)

Statements were also made that if you use duplicate content in hopes to influence the rankings to your benefit, Google will make adjustments. “In the rare cases in which we perceive that duplicate content … we’ll also make adjustment in the indexing and ranking of the sites involved.”

No where does it state what that “perception” may be or what the pending “adjustment” would be.

Let’s go over the main points of the article that you need to know:

What is duplicate content? “It generally refers to substantive blocks of content within or across domains that either completely match other content or are appreciably similar.”

A good tip is that Google will NOT count the same article written in English and Spanish to be duplicate content. Also, “snippets” of text or “quotes” aren’t seen as duplicate content either.

Here is the issue: When Google serves results, they want to serve unique results. Results that have distinct information. “This filtering mean, for instance, that if your site has articles in “regular” and “printer” versions and neither set is blocked in robots.txt or via noindex meta tag, we’ll chose one version to list.” Believe me, you don’t want to rely on a bot to make the right choice. Adam does state that they prefer to filter rather than do ranking adjustments.

What can you do?

  • Block Appropriately: Instead of relying on Google to make the best choice, you should make that choice. If you have two versions of a document, including a printer version, place them in their own folder and disallow that folder from being indexed in the robots.txt file.
  • Use 301s: If you have “dead ends” in your site, use 301 Redirects in your .htaccess file to smartly reroute users and bots. You might also consider using a custom 404 page with the main categories listed in a “site map” format.
  • Show Consistentcy in Linking: Keep things consistent so you aren’t linking to /page/, /page, and page.htm.
  • Use TLDs: If you use TLDs (Top Level Domains) to handle country-specific content, Google will know that .de indicates Germany-focused content easier than it would if it was de.domain.com.
  • Syndicate Carefully: If you syndicate your content on other sites, make sure it contains a link back to the original article on each syndicated article. This will help Google realize which one is the original for them to index.
  • Minimize “Repetition”: If you have lengthy (emphasis on lengthy) copyright text at the bottom of every page, include a brief summary and then a link for more details. The lengthy text could trigger duplicate filters.
  • Avoid Publishing “Stubs”: No one likes seeing “empty” pages and that includes GoogleBot. So, avoid having “placeholders” whenever possible. So, if you have a review site, block pages that have zero reviews. If you have a real estate site, block pages that have zero listings. Nothing is more annoying that a page that states, “Below you’ll find a superb list of all the great rental opportunities in [insert city name]” – but the page contains no listings.
  • Understand Your CMS: Make sure you are familiar, or you hire someone who is familiar, with how the content of your site is displayed. This includes your blog, your forums, or related systems that often shows the same content in multiple formats.
  • Understand the “Big Picture”: Don’t fret too much about sites that scrape your content. Though annoying, it’s highly unlikely that such sites can negatively impact your presence in Google. If there is a major issue, let Google know through a DMCA request.
  • Now that you understand better about Duplicate Content, you can fix the current problems on your site and spend more time focusing on revenue generation.

December
22

Yahoo! Update Complete and Stable

Earlier this month Yahoo! had an update to their index around December 10th. Over the last few weeks we have detected plenty of fluxuations, but things seem to have settled down. Our members of the SEO Revolution will be getting the latest algorithm update and will know exactly what was changed and what to do.

December
22

Yahoo! Paid Inclusion

For some reason, there is still talk about paid inclusion from Yahoo! and their bot Inktomi. I have used paid inclusion for many years – and each time I have used it I have been less than impressed.

Basically, it allows you to get all of your URLs fed into the index and you pay either 15 cents or thirty cents per click. You can also cut a deal for ten cents a click, but only if your site has a ton of quality content, thus, you can qualify for their “library rate”.

A lot of companies rely on it because it allows for their duplicate content to be indexed properly. However, I have consulted for many companies in the past that swore by using Paid Inclusion. Back when I took clients, we did a complete mod_rewrite for them and their URLs were quickly spidered and indexed by Inktomi for free. After a month or so, they cut out paid inclusion, kept their traffic levels steady and saved nearly $20,000 per month.

Did we get a bonus check for that one? No. Another reason why I hated doing client work.

Full Article

December
22

Idiot Callers

So, I came into the office and our receptionist, Elizabeth, who is incredible by the way, handed me a message. “He wouldn’t leave a voice mail,” she said.

Hmmm.

After getting things settled in my office, I called this gentleman, identified myself and that I was returning his phone call. I then asked him what he needed.

“A million dollars in small bills,” was what I heard on the other end.

“Excuse me?”

He repeated himself again to which I replied with a dial tone. I don’t have time to play with the phone.

He called back. Elizabeth answered and he blasted her for us not having a sense of humor.

Her response? Simple and to the point.

We don’t know who he is and since there is no relationship, there is no room for humor in a professional business enviornment. Our time is valuable and he showed a lack of respect, and is continuing to do so.

She then invited him not to call back again.

She rocks. The day is always better when you have good staff who make good decisions.

Let this serve you. When you call a company for either information or to possibly do business with, spend time planning what you will say and get right to the point to be respectful of the other person’s time.

I, for one, would be grateful.

December
12

Trusting Employees Sometimes Sucks

I got an email from someone whom I greatly respect yesterday, Brett Tabke of Webmaster World. He had a question regarding a domain I owned.

Long story short, we were hosting copyrighted information without permission from Brett.

Not good, and I was rather embarrassed as you can imagine.

Background: Last year one of my employees, whom I trusted, was given the task of calling the Webmaster World offices and asking if we could post some files in a password protected area for our members of the SEO Revolution. She told me that we could, but there were some restrictions. We met those restrictions.

In the end, because this employee is a “former” employee it may never be known who she talked to … or if she ever talked to anyone. The main issue is, when it is your business, regardless if it is the fault of your employee, the blame rests on your shoulders. So I took it.

Lesson Learned: When something is vital for your business and it involves an important relationship in your business, do it yourself, or do it with the employee. That is a mistake that I will never make again. Relationships with people of the magnatude of Brett Tabke are too important to risk.

But, I do hate employees that suck. :-)

December
4

Matt Cutts & Hacked Sites

Matt Cutts, the Spam Czar over at Google, had a blog post about what happens when a site gets hacked.

In summary, a site owner had his site hacked and a bunch of animal porn (note: that is animal porn, not midget porn, for those of you scoring at home … er, I mean …) was placed on his site. It took Google about ten days to detect the spam and then delist the site. Of course, the site owner, publicly whined about the deindexing, claiming he never received the warning email from Google and is basically passing blame.

Matt has gone above and beyond with this – which on one hand is commendable, but on the other, the site owner has to bear some responsibility.

1) The site is hosted on a Windows server. Now, I used to have a Windows server to do testing on, but junked it because of all of the hacking attempts. It got to the point where I was spending more time defending the server than doing testing. Cancelling that server was one of the best stress relievers of my life.

2) The server did not have a full-time admin. Why it is people want to have a successful business online, but are unwilling to protect the asset they are building? Geez. I mean, we aren’t talking about spending $10,000 here. Just give $100 over to the server admins that we use and you won’t have to worry about your server again. It is a no brainer.

3) Have your email setup so you can actually receive email when people are trying to contact you.

4) If your site gets hacked, that is your fault. If your site is deindexed by Google because it was hacked and you had a bunch of porn spam posted on your site. That’s your fault too.

Take some responsibility. Get a good server, a great admin and something like this won’t happen again.

Nice job Matt. Not only was it a classy move – but it was good PR for Google too.

December
1

Use The Damn Internet!

I was on the phone with a new member of the SEO Revolution. She had a problem. Her competitor was beating her company in every phase. She was frustrated.

We’ve all been there, right?

She was well educated, smart, and her company well funded. So why were they losing the battle online? There are usually many factors, but one of the main factors is information.

The company has the best information usually wins, right?

Right.

The first thing I did with her on the phone is do a backlinks check … and I went to Yahoo’s Site Explorer instead of a Google Backlink check. You get complete, non-filtered results there.

But before seeing the backlinks, SiteExplorer tells us how many pages are currently indexed. It was a shade under 9,000. Now, this was an industry that doesn’t require 9,000 pages of content. Myfirst thought was that they were auto-generating pages, which would be a violation of Google’s terms of use, therefore, we could do a Spam Report and get them penalized.

I was wrong. I’ve been wrong before … I married my first wife. ;-)

But it was better than that. I went deep into the list quickly, went to Page 10, nothing much there and then I went to Page 14 and there it was. A temporary folder for PDFs. And what were the PDFs? Purchase agreements for ALL of their past clients … and these aren’t just chump clients – the first PDF I clicked on was for a purchase of $347,000.

Now she can walk into the CEOs office and state that she has all of the customers, their names, addresses, phone numbers and what they purchased and when of their biggest competitor.

That information is gold.

How was it obtained? How did I do it? As Jake Baillie of True Local says, “USE THE DAMN INTERNET.”

Competitive Intelligence isn’t difficult – but it is a skill you must acquire in order to really compete in your market.

It also goes both ways, not just getting information from your competitors, but also keeping them from getting it from you.